targuiala

Draghi Puterity

March 14 at 3:34pm

Declaratie Barack Obama 11.03.2016:
"The fact is that Ukraine, which is a non-NATO country, is going to be vulnerable to military domination by Russia no matter what we do."
Rusii au declarat ca analizeaza atent declaratiile lui Obama.

Declaratie Vladimir Putin 14:03.2016:
"I consider the objectives that have been set for the Defense Ministry to be generally accomplished. That is why I order to start withdrawal of the main part of our military group from the territory of the Syrian Arab Republic starting from tomorrow."
Coincidentza? S-au inteles la impartirea zonelor de influentza?

Comments

Prospectiv A-z:
"Coincidentza?"

NU!

"S-au inteles la impartirea zonelor de influentza?"

Cel mai probabil, dar ce inseamna asta?

 

 

Fogarassy Paul Dacă au cedat Siria pentru Ucraina e nasol frown emoticon

 

 

Draghi Puterity Pentru cine?

 

 

Fogarassy Paul Chiar așa ! Doar punând corect problema ai șanse la un rezultat corect smile emoticon Pentru noi singura dilemă este unde trimitem tezaurul data viitoare frown emoticon

 

 

Draghi Puterity Care tezaur? Ca ala vechi e la rusi iar cel de acum e la americani...

 

 

Fogarassy Paul OK (știam că am cu cine vorbi wink emoticon ), atunci am altă dilemă: Pentru cine ne face loc Merkel in Siria ...

 

 

Preda Mihailescu Fogarassy Paul @ Eu credeam ca problema este ca nu mai avem nici un tezaur. Si nici asta nu este singura problema frown emoticon

 

 

Draghi Puterity Fogarassy Paul - Pentru Turci si poate pentru Israel?

 

 

Preda Mihailescu Pai Turcii cam asa s-au comportat. Deci ii fura lui Putin. Si Orban care a cochetat cu amandoi, acum este in dilema.

 

 

Draghi Puterity Preda Mihailescu - Macar asa are de unde alege. Noi... nu.

 

 

Fogarassy Paul Preda Mihailescu Tezaure ? de fapt avem două ... după cum spunea și Draghi. Problema este că le avem de drept, nu de fapt ... după cum ar spune un jurist wink emoticon

 

 

Fogarassy Paul Cum-necum, în Siria se derulează o epurare de facto a populației autohtone. Evident golul demografic va fi umplut. Singurii care îl pot revendica sunt cei cu spor demografic și cu putere financiară capabili de reconstrucție. Mai mult nu pot spune ...

Oricum, sunt câteva lucruri despre care nu se mai vorbește legat de Siria:
- distrugătoarele chineze din zonă
- trupele Iranului staționate în teritoriu
- loviturile aeriene ruse
- cererea Irakului adresată Rusiei
- schimbarea atitudinii beligenranților față de kurzi

 

 

Prospectiv A-z:
In cazul unei intelegeri, dpdv romanesc, cred ca problema se pune asa: Unde am picat si cu ce drepturi si obligatii?

 

 

Prospectiv A-z:

Iata comentariul unuia la Cotidianul:

Ezechiel
Felicitari....foarte bun articolul/ traducerea. Am mai supus atentiei aceasta intrebare : Romania are un plan B in situatia in care, din nou, americanii s-ar intelege cu rusii pe spinarea noastra ??.......... Acest lucru s-a petrecut deja de doua ori : In '47 la abdicarea lui Mihai si in '89 la "abdicarea"lui Ceausescu ! ...S-au aceiasi intrebare, dar pusa altfel : Tratatele pe care Romania le are direct cu SUA (nu NATO, acelea-s slabe) sunt puternice, au aceiasi greutate ca tratatele SUA cu Marea Britanie si Canada, de exemplu care sa ne permita sa "avem toate ouale in acelasi cos" ???

http://www.cotidianul.ro/disputa-rusia-occident-praf-de.../

Disputa Rusia - Occident, praf (de stele) în ochii lumii?

cotidianul.ro

 

 

Prospectiv A-z:
Președintele Federației Ruse, Vladimir Putin, i-a ordonat luni ministrului apărării rus Serghei Șoigu să înceapă de marți retragerea forțelor ruse din Siria, în condițiile în care obiectivele trasate au fost îndeplinite, informează agențiile de presă RIA Novosti, TASS și AFP.

'Consider că obiectivul trasat Ministerului Apărării și forțelor armate ale Federației Ruse a fost în linii mari îndeplinit și din acest motiv îi ordon ministrului apărării să înceapă de mâine retragerea celei mai mari părți a trupelor noastre din Republica Arabă Siriană', a declarat Putin în timpul unei întrevederi pe care a avut-o cu miniștrii apărării și de externe ai Rusiei, Serghei Șoigu și Serghei Lavrov.

Totodată, potrivit președintelui rus, bazele militare ruse din Tartus și de pe aerodromul Hmeymim vor trebui să continue să activeze conform regimului stabilit. 'Bazele noastre — cea maritimă din Tartus și cea aviatică de pe aerodromul Hmeymim — vor funcționa conform vechiului regim. Ele trebuie să fie apărate în mod ferm dinspre uscat, dinspre mare și din aer', a spus Putin la întâlnirea cu Lavrov și Șoigu.

 

 

 

Dinica Roman Ucrainienii nu s-au miscat cum s-au asteptat neoconservatorii si Obama s-a resemnat. Targul cu Rusia e punctual.

 

 

Dinica Roman Comentariile sunt in general elogioase la adresa lui Obama. Se scapa din vedere posibilitatea unui targ.

jamil simaan boston 2 hours ago
Exasctly how is this a surprise? When the Russians started this mission in September, they said it would last about six months. Six months later they are ending it. Is the Obama administration surprised that Russians follow through on their promises? Or are thry just surprised that Russia does not conform to the boogeyman they've painted it as?

It is delusional and self-destructive to ignore what a person says because you "know" what they really mean, only to be shocked to find they actually meant what they said. Next thing you know the White House will be expressing bewilderment that the Ukrainian government is propped up by neo-Nazis. This is not a good way for America to act; in the end Americans will be the ones most hurt.

Abia catre final am gasit asta

ruthazer Montreal, QC 2 hours ago
I suspect he's leaving because of an agreement behind the scenes with the US. There will be some price to pay (perhaps eastern Ukraine?).

http://www.nytimes.com/.../putin-syria-russia-withdrawal...

Putin Orders Start of Syria Withdrawal, Saying Goals Are Achieved

nytimes.com|By Neil MacFarquhar and Anne Barnard

 

 

Nicoleta Surdei ba NU sunt deloc elogioase, DIMPOTRIVA :)) http://dnona.ru/new-york-times-siriya-stala-pozorom.../...

New York Times: Сирия стала позором США и победой Путина

dnona.ru

 

Costel Gilca Ei de mult își împărțisera zonele!

 

 

Nicoleta Surdei aista da ! cu specificația că e mat la obamez wink emoticon

 

Alexandru Botu Devin cei mai supusi cuceritorilor cei care au fost instigati si apoi tradati de protectori puternici.

 

 

Smaranda Dobrescu Exercitiile militare cu un caracter special, in forta, ale Arabiei Saudite la granita Siriei sincron cu retragerea trupelor rusesti ar putea da un raspuns la planul despre care vorbeam care avea in vedere eliberarea unor teritorii printr-un exod controlat ?
http://www.cotidianul.ro/general-sua-retragerea-rusiei.../

General SUA: retragerea Rusiei deschide calea invadării Siriei

cotidianul.ro

 

 

Delia Bogdan E clar ca asta se urmareste. Fiecare rapitor cu prada pe care o doreste!

 

 

Draghi Puterity Trei zile mai tarziu, suspiciuni ca ar fi o cacealama?

https://www.rt.com/news/335949-putin-russia-op-syria/

Putin: Russia may deploy forces back to Syria ‘in mere hours’ if necessary

rt.com

 

 

Dinica Roman Rusii au mai incheiat acorduri cu occidentul, ar trebui sa stie la ce sa se astepte.

Draghi Puterity Dinica Roman like emoticon

Dinica Roman "It’s always crucial to stress that Syria is an energy war – with the “prize” being who will be better positioned to supply Europe with natural gas; the proposed Iran-Iraq-Syria pipeline, or the rival Qatar pipeline to Turkey that would imply a pliable Damascus."

http://sputniknews.com/.../us-russia-syria-bargain.html

Is There a US-Russia Grand Bargain in Syria?

sputniknews.com|By Sputnik

flights of literary embellishment sau istoria romanilor facuta si scrisa de 'prieteni'

Dinica Roman

March 20 at 1:00am

O carte recenta face valva prin State pe motiv ca expune cum ar fi fost lucrat JFK de interesele complexului militar-industrial prin precursorii statului-serviciilor http://www.amazon.com/The-Devils-Chessboard-Am…/…/0062276166 . Afla omul destule, chiar si de Malaxa, desi nu am gasit referinte pentru mai multe din afirmatiile autorului despre contextul romanesc al perioadei in discutie.
By 1952, Richard Nixon’s triumph as a Cold War inquisitor had won him the number-two spot on the Republican presidential ticket headed by war hero Dwight D. Eisenhower. But on September 29, Drew Pearson, Washington’s leading muckraker, dropped a bombshell on Nixon—one of his favorite targets—that briefly threatened to end his political career. The story was part of a larger theme of corruption that reporters like Pearson believed hovered over Nixon’s career. Nixon, the humble son of Whittier, always seemed hungry for ways to profit from his public service.
Earlier in the race, Pearson had discovered that Nixon’s wealthy Southern California supporters had set up a slush fund for the politician’s personal use—a revelation that had nearly forced the vice presidential candidate to resign as Eisenhower’s running mate. It took Nixon’s brilliantly homespun TV address to the nation—which would go down in history as the “Checkers speech” after the black-and-white cocker spaniel that had been given to Nixon’s daughters by a supporter—to preempt the budding scandal and save his political career. “And you know, the kids love the dog,” Nixon told the largest audience that had ever tuned in for a political speech. “And I just want to say this right now, that regardless of what they say about it, we’re going to keep it.” His shameless performance managed to transform a case of blatant political corruption into a domestic drama that touched the hearts of millions of Americans.
Nixon’s enormous relief was shared by the GOP power brokers who had picked him for the race. It was the Dulles-Dewey group that had tapped Nixon for vice president. Their decision was conveyed to Eisenhower by Herbert Brownell Jr., a fellow Wall Street attorney who had taken a leave from his blue-chip firm to run the Republican campaign for the White House. The GOP brain trust convinced the aging general that the young senator from California not only brought regional balance to the ticket but the kind of slashing energy and anti-Communist fervor that the campaign needed.
But now, in the final weeks of the presidential contest, Pearson was again on the verge of blowing up Nixon’s career. Reporting in his widely syndicated Washington Merry-Go-Round column, Pearson revealed that the vice presidential candidate had left out something very important from his Checkers speech: namely, his crooked relationship with a Romanian industrialist named Nicolae Malaxa. The wealthy Romanian émigré had collaborated with the Nazis during the war, and later with the Communist regime that took over his homeland. But Malaxa’s reputation, Pearson reported, did not discredit him with Senator Nixon, who pulled strings on his behalf to allow him to continue living in the United States and to procure a major tax break for him.
Pearson knew that Nixon had performed these favors for Malaxa in return for an impressive bribe. But, lacking the documentary evidence, the columnist had to leave this crucial piece of evidence out of his story.
There was indeed a smoking gun: a $100,000 check from Malaxa deposited in Nixon’s Whittier bank account. But Pearson was unable to get his hands on it. In a twist of bad luck for Nixon, one of the tellers at his bank branch turned out to be a Romanian refugee who loathed Malaxa. He sent a photostatic copy of the check to political rivals of the notorious industrialist in the exile community, who in turn forwarded the copied check to their contact in the CIA, Gordon Mason, chief of the agency’s Balkans desk.
By fall 1952, Allen Dulles was the number two man at the CIA and was in line to take over the agency with an Eisenhower-Nixon victory in November. As deputy director, Dulles was already making the agency his own, working with loyal associates like Frank Wisner—who would soon take over the agency’s action arm—on ways to escalate the covert war against the Eastern bloc. But the ambitious plans that Dulles and Wisner were hatching for a long-awaited Republican presidency suddenly seemed in peril when Gordon Mason walked into Wisner’s office with a copy of the Malaxa check. “Jesus Christ!” Wisner burst out. “We’d better see Allen Dulles.”
As he had long demonstrated, Frank Wisner was quite willing to recruit from among the ranks of ex-fascists for his espionage operations in Eastern Europe—many of whom he had slipped past immigration authorities into the United States despite their barbaric wartime records. But Wisner, somewhat mysteriously, had insisted on drawing the line with Nicolae Malaxa, whom he considered a particularly “unsavory” character. In a March 1951 CIA memo, Wisner had even urged that Malaxa—who had finagled his way into the United States after the war as part of a Romanian trade delegation—be deported. Wisner had served as the OSS station chief in Romania, and he considered the country his turf. He was acutely sensitive to the factions and feuds within the Romanian exile community, where Malaxa provoked feelings passionate enough to tear apart all hope of a united anti-Soviet front.
Despite Wisner’s feelings about Malaxa, he realized that Allen Dulles was deeply implicated in the Romanian’s “unsavory” story. Dulles had not only been Malaxa’s lawyer, he had introduced him to Nixon. The Malaxa money trail, in fact, led in many compromising directions, including Nixon’s bank account, Dulles’s law firm, CIA front organizations like the National Committee for a Free Europe, and even some of Wisner’s own secret combat groups. The Romanian industrialist, who reportedly stashed away as much as $500 million (worth over $6.5 billion today) in overseas accounts before he fled to the United States, had made himself extremely useful as a shadow financier for the underground Cold War.
Malaxa was the type of charming scoundrel with whom Dulles enjoyed doing business. The Romanian oligarch had no ideology; he believed only in opportunity. He had a witty sense of humor and the dark good looks of a dashing werewolf, with thick black hair and a pronounced widow’s peak. He conducted himself with a cynical, Mittel-European confidence that everyone had a price, greasing his way through life by smoothly slipping cash to all the right people. Bribery came so naturally to Malaxa that he once tried to buy off the dedicated U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service prosecutor who was handling his case—a man who, to Malaxa’s great surprise, turned out to be incorruptible.
He began his career in modest fashion, as a locomotive repairman, but he had a talent for making connections and opening doors, and soon he amassed a small fortune as a manufacturer of railroad equipment. In the 1920s, he and his family moved into a mansion in Bucharest, where he entertained the capital’s high society, and befriended the mistress of King Carol II, Madame Magda Lupescu. In a deft, Game of Thrones–like move, he cemented his royal connections by arranging for his own daughter to become the mistress of the king’s son, Prince Michael. By forging a partnership with the king, who proved equally avaricious, Malaxa became a dominant player in the country’s steel, munitions, and oil industries.
In the 1930s, as Hitler built his war machine in Germany, King Carol’s rule came under increasing pressure from a homegrown fascist movement known as the Iron Guard. The virulently anti-Semitic organization blamed Jews for Romania’s woes and targeted prominent Jewish figures such as Madame Lupescu. Despite the debt he owed the king’s mistress for her patronage, the ever-opportunistic Malaxa began currying favor with the Iron Guard as the group grew more powerful, financing its activities and flying its flag from the roof of his stone mansion.
In September 1940, the Iron Guard forced King Carol to abdicate and a pro-German fascist government took power in Bucharest. With Hitler’s influence expanding in Romania, Malaxa made another nimble move, merging his industrial empire with that of Herman Goering’s brother Albert. “Your interests, my dear Mr. Malaxa, are the same as ours,” the Nazi industrialist warmly assured him.
In January 1941, Malaxa’s green-uniformed Iron Guard thugs, feeling betrayed by Romania’s new fascist government, launched a coup attempt, using the industrialist’s mansion as a base for their assault. During the coup, the Iron Guard fell upon the country’s Jews in one of the most horrific spasms of violence in Romania’s history. Thousands of Jews in Bucharest were rounded up and beaten and tortured, including one group of more than a hundred—among them children as young as five—who were marched into a municipal slaughterhouse and butchered. The Iron Guardsmen hung their victims, some still alive, on meat hooks and “mutilated them in a vicious parody of kosher slaughtering practices,” according to one later account. The Iron Guard’s Bucharest pogrom was so depraved that it shocked even the country’s fascist regime, which appealed to Hitler to help put down the uprising.
After the coup was suppressed, Malaxa was jailed as a leader of the conspiracy and his industrial empire was confiscated by the Nazis and the Romanian government. But, in 1944, as the advancing Soviet army drove the Germans out of Romania, Malaxa again rose from the ashes, insinuating himself into the new Moscow-backed regime. He was the only Romanian capitalist to whom the Communist government returned his industrial property.
Nevertheless, Malaxa was savvy enough to realize that his future was not bright in a Communist Romania. He had already taken the precaution of salting away much of his huge fortune in U.S. accounts. After the war, by making a generous distribution of bribes—including jewels, Cadillacs, and cash—Malaxa persuaded Romanian officials to allow him to travel to the United States, ostensibly on trade business for the country. He arrived in 1946 and never returned home.
Malaxa wisely chose to apply for permanent residency, instead of American citizenship, knowing the process was not as demanding. But his résumé was so eyebrow raising that his battle to stay in the United States would drag on for years. Malaxa’s OSS, CIA, FBI, and INS files bulged with condemnations of his morally dexterous, shape-shifting life. One government report labeled him “notorious.” Another called him “the most perfidious man in Romania.” He was a “master of the art of bribery” who had ushered in an “era of corruption” in Romania. He was a flagrant “opportunist” who “had been on all sides of the fence at various times.” He had gone from playing “Hitler’s game” to someone who “must be considered an agent of the Soviet government and of the Romanian Communists in the United States, even if he himself is not a Communist at heart.”
According to a 1952 CIA memo, “perhaps the most concise appraisal of Malaxa” came from an American diplomat who found him “entirely unscrupulous, turning with the wind, and like a cat [he] has developed to a high art the knack of landing on his feet. He is considered to be essentially a dangerous type of man.”
None of this mattered to Allen Dulles when Malaxa turned up at his office at Sullivan and Cromwell. The pertinent fact was that the Romanian had a huge fortune, and he was willing to spend millions of it where Dulles wanted him to. In return for financing Dulles’s far-flung anti-Communist network—which stretched from Buenos Aires to Bucharest—Malaxa secured Dulles’s influential help in his battle to stay in the United States. Some of Malaxa’s treasure went to prominent Romanian exile leaders who hoped to take power after the Communist regime was toppled. Other funds went to Juan Perón’s Argentina, where Malaxa was involved in a rising neofascist movement, and France, where he underwrote “scholarships” for exiled Romanian “students” who turned out to be veterans of the vicious Iron Guard.
By 1948, Malaxa was ensconced in a luxurious apartment on Manhattan’s Fifth Avenue, but his wheeling and dealing had begun to attract unwanted press attention. In May, gossip columnist Walter Winchell exposed the notorious collaborator who was freely enjoying the city’s pleasures—the “Balkanazi on Broadway,” he called Malaxa. Winchell noted that the “distinguished” firm of Sullivan and Cromwell had recently dropped the Romanian as a client, presumably because he had grown too hot.
But Dulles did not abandon Malaxa; behind the scenes, he entrusted the Romanian’s immigration battle to his political protégé Nixon. In return for Malaxa’s substantial gift of $100,000, the California senator began vigorously lobbying INS officials on his behalf and pushing an immigration bill through Congress that was designed to win Malaxa U.S. residency. When those efforts stalled due to determined resistance from legislators who were repelled by the émigré’s past, Malaxa and Nixon tried a different tack. With the help of Nixon cronies in Southern California, Malaxa announced that he was setting up a pipeline factory in Whittier that he called the Western Tube Corporation. Nixon wrote a letter to the Defense Production Administration, claiming that Malaxa’s project was “strategically and economically important, for both California and the entire United States.” The Western Tube factory was never built, but the phantom project succeeded in winning Malaxa a huge tax windfall. And it kept alive the Romanian’s immigration campaign. California congressman John Shelley later denounced the Western Tube affair as “a complete fraud, a springboard for [Malaxa’s] entry to the United States.”
As the smoldering Malaxa scandal threatened to erupt into flames in the final days of the 1952 presidential race, Dulles moved quickly to douse it. After Wisner and Mason showed him Malaxa’s $100,000 check, the deputy CIA director knew that he would have to send it up the chain of command to his boss, General Walter Bedell Smith. But Dulles also realized that, in this case, passing the buck was as good as destroying the evidence. CIA director “Beetle” Smith had served as Eisenhower’s intensely dedicated chief of staff during the war, and he was just as devoted to Ike’s presidential victory as Dulles.
It was Gordon Mason who was given the unpleasant task of showing the evidence of Nixon’s corruption to General Smith, who predictably flew into a rage. “Smith was a man who could cuss in three languages and in almost every sentence,” recalled Mason. “He also had a violent temper, and he acted as though I personally was trying to scuttle Eisenhower.” Smith demanded that Mason immediately gather up every scrap of incriminating material against Nixon and bring it to his office. “The story was cleaned from the books,” said Mason. Wisner, too, had no doubt what was done with the evidence. “Beetle just flushed it all down the toilet.”
Without a copy of the Malaxa check, Drew Pearson could not keep the story going, and it soon petered out. On Election Day, Eisenhower and Nixon swept to a decisive victory, winning 55 percent of the vote and carrying thirty-nine of the forty-eight states.
After the Republican triumph, Dulles and Nixon were finally able to speed Malaxa’s immigration case through the bureaucracy. In December 1953, officials in Eisenhower’s Justice Department bypassed Congress and the INS and granted Malaxa permanent residence through an administrative decree. Justice Department officials explained that they had reached their decision due to the unique technical services provided by the Western Tube Corporation. The fact that Malaxa’s company did not actually exist—and never would—was politely overlooked by the new administration.
Nicolae Malaxa lived out the rest of his days in the comfort of his Fifth Avenue apartment. He began to fancy himself a great benefactor. In January 1953, shortly before Eisenhower’s inauguration, Malaxa reached out the hand of friendship to a prominent Jewish exile named Iancu Zissu. Malaxa sent word that he was eager to meet with Zissu, who was the cofounder of a Romanian exile group. The odd meeting took place in the New York apartment of a popular Romanian singer. According to one witness, “Malaxa told Zissu that he had wanted for some time to know him because he is a great friend of the Jews and a great admirer of the Jewish religion. Malaxa stated that if he could change his own religion, he would adopt the Jewish faith.”
As he bid Zissu farewell, Malaxa “assured him that those who had been his friends had never had reasons to regret it.” It was a surprising burst of goodwill—or, more likely, another attempt by the wily millionaire to buy political support.
From the financial patron of Iron Guard butchers to “great friend of the Jews”—it was just one more grotesque twist in a life filled with them.

The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government

An explosive, headline-making portrait of Allen Dulles, the man who transformed the CIA into the most powerful—and secretive—colossus in Washington, from…

amazon.com

Comments

Prospectiv A-z:
Un episod cu trimiteri la istoria Romaniei dintr-o perioada pe care ne straduim inca sa o deztelenim. Nu ma astept la intelegere sau o foarte atenta analiza a detaliilor dela autorul american, dar observ o maniera pe care mi-e greu sa o descriu mai bine decat 'Top critical review', din care citez:

"If I were to take Talbot to task for anything, it would be for his flights of literary embellishment. In much the same manner modern media uses hyperbole to lead their viewers toward their points, Talbot has a tendency to become a bit sensationalist with an often unrestrained use of colorful and borderline hyperbolic adjectives. Rather than make his points, it often has the effect of making his academic work seem more like one of Howard Hunt's badly written spy thrillers." Sursa: http://www.amazon.com/.../RE6U2R9N9.../ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm...

Deisgur, cartea nu este despre Romania, iar pitorescul Malaxa este folosit ca sa ilustreze cu cine se asociau Republicanii americani si de unde primeau acestia finantare. Cei care citesc aceasta carte nu vor avea un ochi critic pentru cum este tratata istoria romaneasca, dar le va intra in cap ca Romania este o problema cu care e cel mai bine sa ai de-a face dela distanta unui... satelit.

"... been studying the Dulles Brothers since..." a review of: The Devil's…

amazon.com

 

 

 

Smaranda Dobrescu Nu e deloc exclus ca “the most perfidious man in Romania.” sa fi fost de atunci depasit in performante de alti romani "talentati"

 

 

Preda Mihailescu Mi se pare relativ fantezista tratarea subiectului! Malaxa practicand dezbinarea emigratiei, ca un securist? Oare?

 

 

Gavrila Ch Se stie/thanks to Larry Watt/ ca acel Frank Wisner a fost un 'prieten' teribil al romanilor si Romaniei, sabotand interesele noastre cu orice ocazie s-a ivit, din pozitia de mare dulau al serviciilor americane.

 

 

Prospectiv A-z:
Se mai stie ca a avut o viata dominata de demoni. Citez din wikipedia:

"Wisner was devastated when the Soviet Union crushed the Hungarian Revolution of 1956. Soon after the Soviet crackdown on the Hungarian revolution, Wisner suffered a breakdown, and was diagnosed as a manic depressive. He underwent psychoanalysis and was subjected to electroshock therapy.
[...]
In Maryland, Frank Wisner committed suicide using one of his son's shotguns."

Romanii gresesc prin a crede ca toate natiile sunt binecuvantate cu toate cela ca Romania si nu inteleg ca ceilalti umbla cu japca. Cei care exploateaza naivitatea/bunatatea/credulitatea romanilor par ca si-o fura dela soarta corespunzator.

Nu stiu ce plan are Dumnezeu cu romanii, dar as incerca mai adesea sa-L ajut.

Apărare şi industrie

Gheorghe Gradinaru

March 24 at 3:20am

New Strategy Center a realizat un document de politici publice în urma unei serii de dezbateri grupate sub titlul "Forumul Strategic pentru Apărare şi Industrie". Aceasta este primă parte a documentului NSC ce analizează proiectele de achiziţie de tehnică militară, situaţia industriei naţionale de apărare şi oferă o serie de recomandări pentru dezvoltarea unui profil de ţară stabilă într-o regiune cu un potenţial de conflict ridicat.
Citeste mai mult: adev.ro/o4fsmf

Apărare şi industrie. România nu poate fi un actor regional relevant fără o armată modernă şi o...

New Strategy Center a realizat un document de politici publice în urma unei serii de dezbateri grupate sub titlul

adevarul.ro

Eugénia Paraschiv Pe másurá lor, a nevoilor, oare mai sesizeazá cineva operaţionalitatea dresajului logic al inversiunilor...?...

 

 

Prospectiv A-z:
GG, observa in textul postat de prospectiva Smaranda Dobrescu referinta la cum BHO l-a facut pe Cameron sa aduca bugetul militar la 2%. Poate ca-ti amintesti cand m-am indoit aici public de seriozitatea pro-atlanticismului la basism pe acest motiv. Oricum, asa ceva ar fi prezentat o poarta grozava diplomatilor romani pre-1990 pentru a permite re/industrializarea Romaniei, e drept, cu industria de armament mai intai...

Doctrina Obama

Smaranda Dobrescu

March 23 at 9:09pm

Daca George W. Bush a fost mai degraba un jucator de zaruri decat un personaj negativ, care va fi retinut si judecat cu asprime in memoria publica pentru cele facute in Orientul Mijlociu, Obama are toate sansele sa fie judecat pozitiv dupa lucrurile pe care nu le-a facut.
Iata o trecere in revista a mandatelor lui Obama cat o carte relevanta, necesara sa putem admite ca daca in cei 10 ani de mandat in aceasta lume disperata dupa putere si bani nu a pornit marea conflagratie, se datoreaza si lui Obama in mare masura

peromaneste™: Doctrina Obama

Comments

Prospectiv A-z:
'Prietenii' au tot tras de Obama sa le scoata castanele din foc. Remarcati cum Obama i-a spus lui Bibi ca nu-i chiar asa fraier cum credea specialistul asta in alba-neagra sau cum Marea Britanie a trebuit sa puna 2% la aparare! Un tip deliberat care totusi foloseste referinte din cultura populara dela Hollywood. Interesant cum modelele sale de politica externa au fost Bush I si consilierul acestuia pe securitate, Brent Scowcroft.

De asemenea, aflam ceva si despre ceea ce el metaforic numeste Washington Playbook: "There’s a playbook in Washington that presidents are supposed to follow. It’s a playbook that comes out of the foreign-policy establishment. And the playbook prescribes responses to different events, and these responses tend to be militarized responses. Where America is directly threatened, the playbook works." Cred ca Obama este a primul presedinte dupa JFK care deviaza dela playbook.

Ce credeti, are Obama dreptate ca lumea se indreapta catre internationalismul post-tribal/national/religios? In ce masura?

 

 

Mihai Ion Turcu Din pozitia de Presedinte al SUA, obligatoriu perspectiva este globala, dar una in care axa este SUA. prin natura lor SUA nu pot fi "tribale' , este o natiune politica, din imigranti care ocupa un teritoriu vast in care indigenii, tribali, cu specificul lor, au fost inghezuiti in cateva rezervatii. Multitudinea de denominatii religioase, protestante, tinde sa argumenteze liberalismul religios. Religios SUA sunt protestante, fervent anticqatolice. Opresiunea religioasa catolica a protestantilor a fost una din cauzele imigrarii organizate in "Lumea Noua". Protestantismul se traduce in conceptul constitutional al SUA. constitrutia nu permite persecutia religioasa, catolicii se inmultesc prin imigratia "latinilor" , dar exista o discriminare subjacenta a libercugetatorilor si catolicilor. Cetatenia SUA in sine este obiect de "mandrie" personala, cu promovarea unui cult al natiunii, o forma de religie seculara politica. Rezulta atat din protestantism cat si din cultul natiunii politice spiritul mesianic cultivat americanilor."Noi suntem baietii buni ai planetei", detinatorii solutiei, eliberatori, progresisti,justitiari, in consecinta legitimi in actele de politici externe si agresiuni. Capitalismul financiar internationalizat, puterea banului meu persoana fizica, si interesul meu privind fructificarea lui, devenita principiu tradus in politici, genereaza lichidationismul barierelor una politica fiind suveranitatile nationale etichetate ca "tribale" oentru a justifica prin inferioritatea inclusa in eticheta, desfiintarea lor, nu si suveranitatea SUA, sacra care prin fermitatea ei ocroteste banul meu si-i asigura fructificarea fara oprelisti. Ce se face "pentru ca pot" contravine paradigmelor "nationale" care reactioneaza dupa putere si determinare, atat vreme cat exista. Puteri comparabile sunt cateva, celorlate , sistematic le este erodata determinarea in a se opune si rezista presiunii. Este inexorabila standardizarea in paradigma qamericana, nu.

 

 

Prospectiv A-z:

Forate bune observatii. Nici eu nu cred ca lumea va intra curand in post-national, iar asta este tocmai din cauza ca lucrurile incalca orice idee de contract social (a se vedea comentariul urmator al prospectivei Smaranda Dobrescu). Ar fi ce cred ca spune Obama doar dupa un alt razboi mondial castigat de partea americanilor... Repet, razboi mondial si nu razboi rece, castigat si nu asumat.

Deh, daca-ti tragi seva din cultura populara si spui ca in Orientul Mijlociu conflictele sunt milenare...

Smaranda Dobrescu Pornesc de la definitia simplificata a nationalismului, ca fiind dorinta unei natiuni de auto-determinare.In principal doua mi se par elementele care ar putea influenta mai departe tipul de nationalism sau lipsa acestuia: Tipul de democratie adoptat in tara sau un grup de tari si existenta la nivelul natiunii a resurselor suficiente.
A.Daca omenirea in ansamblu va considera ca Contractul Social definit de Jean Jaques Rousseau in secolul 18 conform caruia politicile capata legitimitate prin participarea activa a cetatenilor, atunci nationalismul va fi de tip civic si se va plasa in cadrul rationalismului si liberalismului. Ideile civic-nationale au influentat si pot influenta in continuare dezvoltarea democratiei reprezentative, atatia ani adoptata in Statele Unite si tarile Europei vestice.

Tabloul actual al mapamondului ne indreptateste sa gandim si la un nationalism de tip etnic care poate lua forma unui nationalism de stat. Statul trebuie sa fie puternic prin excelenta in acest caz iar statul lui Mussolini de tip fascist e cel mai bun exemplu in care cetatenii sunt obligati sa traiasca, sa respire si sa se dedice totalmente nevoilor statului. Conditii exceptionale pot conduce la acest tip de nationalism. Este un stat autoritar intrat in conflict cu ideile liberale ale libertatii individuale si cu principiile liberal-democratice. (Dictatura lui Franco poate fi privita ca un soi de nationalism de stat)

Un al treilea tip de nationalism posibil ar fi acela a de tip expansionist motivat in mare masura de dorinta de acaparare a resurselor si influentelor in alte teritorii pe care le colonizeaza sau le transforma in protectorate in cel mai bun caz.Acest tip de nationalism ar putea fi asimilat cu National-Socialismul (nazismul) si cu American Manifest Destinyand care au aspecte comune cu neoconservatorismul.

B. Daca tipul de democratie se va fi schimbat in democratie participativa (dorita se pare de neoconservatorii americani), atunci acesta va determina o intarire a internationalismul in stransa legatura cu globalizarea si cu tratatele de liber schimb.
Am vorbit teoretic, caci in aceasta perioada lucrurile pot lua o turnura rapida diferita, contradictorie cu teoria de pana acum si se pot escalada fie conflicte majore, fie pot aparea la nevoie consensuri privind apararea planetei.

Deocamdata vad a continua sa se manifeste tendintele internationaliste sustinatoare pentru o economie globala si cele nationaliste civice provocate de tratate monetare fiscale trecatoare care aduc atingere suveranitatii si autodeterminarii. Exodul de refugiati oriunde in lume poate conduce la forme de nationalism etnic.

Totul fain pe flancul germano-american!

Totul fain pe flancul germano-american! – 10 martie 2016

 

Prospectiv A-z a distribuit fotografia postată de Charlie Rose.

 

Charlie Rose

Tonight, a conversation with Ursula von der Leyen, the defense minister of Germany. Tune in on PBS.

 

Draghi Puterity Si iaca asa nu mai e nici o problema nici cu titlul de doctor emoticon wink

http://www.spiegel.de/.../ursula-von-der-leyen-darum-darf...

 

 

Trotz Plagiaten: Darum darf von der Leyen ihren Doktor behalten - SPIEGEL ONLINE

SPIEGEL.DE|DE SPIEGEL ONLINE, HAMBURG, GERMANY

Prospectiv A-z .
Si iertati-le, voi pomporul, greselile prietenilor mei, ca sa vi le iert si eu p'ale voastre!

 

Draghi Puterity Deci si fenta cu plagiatele astea s-a cam fasait. Cade doar "cine trebuie"... Sunt curios care va fi urmatoarea gaselnita. Ce simpla era lumea mai demult cand o tineau consecvent cu "drepturile omului".emoticon grin (Apropo - Monica Macovei : Intr-o tara in care criminalitatea este ridicata, drepturile omului nu pot fi exercitate pe deplin.)

 

Eugénia Paraschiv Homo Fraudens...)))))))

 

Prospectiv A-z .
"drepturile omului nu pot fi exercitate pe deplin" Intr-o tzara ca Romania, acestea n-ar trebui sa fie protejate de Constitutie?

 

Prospectiv A-z .
Draghi, ma intreb cat va mai rezista si mitul germanului in Romania. Dupa scrierile lui Platon & Golban despre istoria relatiei economice Germania-Romania te-ai fi gandit ca lumea s-a mai temperat. Mult mai ia scrierilor istorice sa le ajunga!

 

Draghi Puterity Citeste pe FB cum comenteaza lumea despre "neamtzul nostru" si cred ca o sa ajungi la concluzia ca intrebarea ar trebui pusa la timpul trecut. Drept e ca si voi, cei de peste ocean, ati ajutat subtil, asa ca intre aliatzi, la daramarea mitului asta, cu scandalul VW si alte mici ghionturi la momentul oportun date de ONG-uri, insa intrebarea relevanta aici e alta: care mit se darama mai repede, cel al americanului sau cel al germanului? Si ce vine in loc? Poate e o sansa sa ii punem pe ai nostri. Da, stiu ca ai nostri au capre care trebuie sa moara, cu orice pretz, dar poate scapam si de racila asta cu ocazia asta.

 

Prospectiv A-z .
"care mit se darama mai repede, cel al americanului sau cel al germanului? Si ce vine in loc?"

Hipersistemul sau Razboi--raspuns nu doar la a doua intrebare.

"Poate e o sansa sa ii punem pe ai nostri. Da, stiu ca ai nostri au capre care trebuie sa moara, cu orice pretz, dar poate scapam si de racila asta cu ocazia asta."

"Ai nostri" unde semneaza condica?

"Drept e ca si voi, cei de peste ocean, ati ajutat subtil, asa ca intre aliatzi, la daramarea mitului asta, cu scandalul VW si alte mici ghionturi la momentul oportun date de ONG-uri"

Foarte adevarat! Un gest *prietenesc* de a intari perspectiva celor ca Ursula von der Leyen despre cui si cat se datoreaza miracolul german postbelic.

Draghi, admit existenta in mod legic a polilor de gandire si in spatiul germanic. Nu situ cat si ce reprezinta fiecare, insa daca polul desprinderii prevaleaza, sa fie dispus sa-si asume si costurile.

Dela nivelul meu, ma ingrozesc la ideea hipersistemului caci pune elita financiara inainte de toate, iar efectele urmaririi intereselor de catre acesti sociopati se lovesc de barierele fizice ale planetei--caci relativ la morala, acestia, fiind adevarati nietzscheeni, au decis ca nevoile lor sunt dincolo de bine si de rau.

 

Draghi Puterity Prospectiv A-z - Din cate citesc eu prin forumurile mass-mediei "sidestream" (ca cele din mainstream au cam fost inchise de cand a inceput povestea cu Ucraina, cum era de asteptat) nu as zice ca polul desprinderii prevaleaza. Multi gandesc "pragmatic"(adica lipsiti de capacitatea de a extrapola intr-o perspectiva istorica) cam in ideea: "in fond la noi e mai bine decat la altii, de ce sa schimbam ceva". In plus "cabala" pare foarte consolidata la parghiile puterii. Desi daca "mamica" mai face vreo doua trei gafe de genul celei cu refugiatii, cine stie. Intreaba-ma mai mult luni, dupa ce au loc alegeri locale in cateva landuri printre care si landul meu, Baden-Württemberg.

 

Prospectiv A-z .
OK, multumesc de completare. Am senzatia ca vorbim cam de aceleasi lucruri--corecteaza-ma daca ti se pare ca gresesc. Mai departe, prospectiv pe romaneste, se pune intrebarea: Si cu romanii ce-i de facut? Cum spuneam odata cuiva din Grup, solutia este locala, trebuie initiata din Romania, iar noi sa-i ajutam/asistam cu toate mijloacelela indemana.

 

Smaranda Dobrescu "Ai nostri unde semneaza condica"? Raspunsul care ni se parea simplu in urma cu doua luni, se pare ca nu mai e valabil iar lucrurile sunt volatile. Nu mai demult decat in seara asta l-am ascultat la radio pe premier exprimandu-se ca in cazul hotarariimai marilor UE ca Uniunea va continua cu mai multe viteze, Romania nu va fi dispusa sa accepte acest lucru si va lua in considerare si variante iesirii. (!!) Sigur ca acest lucru poate insemna in viziunea unui sceptic inclusiv ca ne vom grabi sa aderam la euro!

 

Mihai Ion Turcu Hipersistemul este contra naturii si contra sistemicitatii insasi. Functionarea sistemica cere alteritate.Privind mitizarile, daca nu privesc panteonul clasic si eroii de epopee, contrazic realitatea si bunul simt.

Prospectiv A-z .
Civilizatia este impotriva naturii, domnule Turcu! 

Problema hipersistemului, la nivelul meu de perceptie si reprezentare, este una ecologica in primul rand. Poate foarte bine sa fie ultimul etaj al Turnului Babel din timpul nostru.

Ca veni vorba, care si cum vedeti alternativa la hipersistem?

 

Prospectiv A-z .
Cernobil si Fukushima sunt numai 2 din cele mai vizibile semnale ca hiper/sistemul, caracterizat si de exploatarea necugetata a resurselor, este la limitele sale.

De exemplu, nu s-au putut strange un miliard pentru a face un nou sarcofag pentru Cernobilul care supureaza radioactivitate. Despre Fukushima nu se mai discuta NIMIC, desi e un eveniment mai grav decat Cernobilul, aflat in continuare in situatie de criza. Intre timp, finantam/cheltuim pe tot felul de zorzoane cu care sa ne impopotanam fatza de victime. 

http://www.cotidianul.ro/dezastrul-de-la-cernobil.../

 

 

Dezastrul de la Cernobîl dăinuie și după 30 de ani

COTIDIANUL.RO

 

Dinica Roman http://www.pacificapost.com/confronting-signs-of-a...

 

 

Confronting Signs of a Society in Decline

PACIFICAPOST.COM|DE NIKOLE HOLLENITSCH

 

Dinica Roman  http://www.democracynow.org/.../average_temperature...

 

 

Average Temperature Briefly Tops 2 Degrees in New Climate Milestone

DEMOCRACYNOW.ORG

 

Mihai Ion Turcu Prospectiv A-z @impotriva naturii sistemicitatii (Teoria Generala a Sistemelor).

Dinica Roman "But a full cleanup of the site — including the extraction of melted uranium fuel from the damaged reactor cores — is expected to take at least 40 years according to the government's timetable and a century by other estimates. In the meantime, officials acknowledge, Fukushima remains vulnerable.
"The question is, Is there a Plan B to deal with another big quake or tsunami?" Professor Suzuki said."

http://www.nytimes.com/.../japan-fukushima-nuclear...Vezi traducerea

 

 

Fukushima Keeps Fighting Radioactive Tide 5 Years After…

NYTIMES.COM|DE JONATHAN SOBLE

 

Draghi Puterity In umbra TTIP-ului, von der Leyen pregateste "outsourcing-ul" industriei de aparare germane. Primul pas, renuntarea la serviciile celor 5000 de angajati ai ministerului care decid asupra calitatii produselor achizitionate de Bundeswehr. 

Stirea dintr-o perspectiva germana si ruseasca:

http://www.spiegel.de/.../bundeswehr-ursula-von-der-leyen...

http://de.sputniknews.com/.../leyen-aufloesung-verwaltung...

 

Prospectiv A-z .
Cred ca din ce in ce mai multi isi pun problema: Ce-i de facut?! Ascensiunile liderilor carismatici sunt consecinte legice ale unor astfel de miscari de viol public al inteligentei popoarelor.