luni, 27 aprilie 2015


A WIN-WIN SOLUTION
To achieve this win-win scenario, success will require something from the West that has been in remarkably short supply since the end of the Cold War: long-term cooperative thinking about, and with, Russia. Russia should certainly back down from its threats to Ukraine and restore fully sovereignty to Crimea. But the West should also give Russia the security and assurances of economic cooperation that it needs. These include a closer economic association between Russia and the European Union; respect for Russia’s efforts to forge closer economic links with its own Eurasian neighbors; support for a Ukrainian government that is respectful to both Russia and the European Union, rather than one that threatens Russia’s security and economic interests; and the respect by all parties for Ukraine’s borders and national sovereignty.
The European Union, Russia, Ukraine, and the United States all share an interest in a system of international law and foreign policy behavior that is not simply a matter of national convenience and opportunism, but is an inducement for further cooperation. All four parties would be wise to follow that principle now. By doing so, they can avoid an escalation of the current crisis -- one that could end in tragedy if rhetoric and bombast trump reality.
Events are moving rapidly in Ukraine. The mass uprising in Kiev that toppled Viktor Yanukovych’s corrupt and incompetent regime did so without a clear framework...
FOREIGNAFFAIRS.COM

  • Todosiciuc Bogdan Adrian Problema e ca nu se vrea un win-win solution. Razboiul Rece a luat o pauza in anii 90 dar continua acum. Daca va uitati pe o harta politica din anii 60-70 vedeti ca Irak, Iran, Afganistan, Europa de Est si nordul Africii/Arabia/Orientul Mijlociu erau fie in interiorul fie in proximitatea sferei de influenta sovietica. Irakul si Afganistanul l-au rezolvat militar, Europa de Est au integrat-o, Nordul Africii/Arabia/Orientul Mijlociu a avut "revolutii" sau razboaie civile si Iranul e on-hold momentan. Rezultatul e izolarea treptata a Rusiei si plasarea de baze americane cat mai aproape de Rusia.

  • Un Prospectiv .
    Sachs suna ca si cum ar avea mustrari de constiinta pentru sfaturile sale din anii '90.


    Cred totusi ca-i vorba si de altceva, daca aceasta luare de cuvant, intr-un asa loc, e considerata impreuna cu ultimele 3 dela discutia noastra despre Ukraina (unde as fi pus-o si p'asta): Se pare ca in SUA sunt cel putin 2 voci. Tenorul este vocea neocon. Contra-tenorul sunt acesti realisti, care inteleg ca tenorul joaca totul pe o carte si e cam la cacealma. 

    In schema asta, Nuland e tenorul, Obama e contratenorul.

  • Todosiciuc Bogdan Adrian Mai e o voce, ca tot mi-ai amintit de el in postarea anterioara. Strategul-razboinic:
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/.../25b3f928-a2f5-11e3-84d4...
    NATO must clearly convey that it’s prepared to respond to Putin’s aggression.
    WASHINGTONPOST.COM

  • Smaranda Dobrescu Mai sunt si voci mai imititele din UE bulversate de niste aspecte ale revolutiei. Macar amanuntele varsarii de sange s-ar putea afla mai devreme de 50 ani, precum la noi . http://www.cotidianul.ro/russia-today-lunetistii-de-la.../
    După o convorbire telefonică interceptată, Russia...
    COTIDIANUL.RO

  • Gheorghe Gradinaru Un Prospectiv si eu cred ca in SUA sunt 2 fractiuni, corect identificate de dumneavoastra, ale caror pozitii si atitudini sunt bazate pe prioritati si interese strategice diferite si nu in ultimul rind de lupta politica interna , dintre cele doua partide din SUA.

  • Gavrila Ch Some people can't help themselves - iata inca o politiciana ce vorbeste prin palarie: http://au.news.yahoo.com/.../clinton-tries-to-fix-putin.../.
    Potential Democratic U.S. presidential candidate...
    AU.NEWS.YAHOO.COM

  • Gavrila Ch Sigur, se va spune ca-i pentru consumul intern

  • Un Prospectiv .
    Gavrila, pentru la internE a fost prima sau a doua interventie?

Niciun comentariu: