Prospectiv A-z shared Foreign Affairs's photo.

October 30, 2014

.
Pe de-o parte, nu poti sa complici infinit argumentul pe hatisuri legalistice. Pe de alta, ce te faci daca Romania si alte foste tari socialiste isi doresc garantii de securitate NATO/americane?

Primul Razboi Mondial a fost incheiat in coada de peste, adica fara o capitulare germana. Dupa Al Doilea Razboi Mondial, sovietii au instituit un regim mai draconic decat ce ar fi putut intelege Aliatii ca avea sa urmeze in noile democratii populare.

Cum citesc puterile europene extinderea NATO? Ce anume a cauzat toata discutia, Ucraina?

Foreign Affairs

In enlarging NATO after the Cold War, Washington broke a key promise to Moscow:

http://ow.ly/DzXUP

(Photo: Reuters)

• 

  Prospectiv A-z .
  Since most of the proposed solutions to the Ukraine crisis depend on some form of Russian cooperation, policymakers should heed the core lesson of 1990: if Washington wants to reduce tensions with Moscow, it must meaningfully limit NATO’s eastern presence. To this end, NATO leaders should resist calls to beef up the alliance’s military role in eastern Europe and prepare for ongoing military competition with Russia. Only then can NATO provide Russia with credible assurances of its intentions. As in 1990, words will mean little without action.
  
  JOSHUA R. ITZKOWITZ SHIFRINSON is an Assistant Professor at the George Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A&M University.

  
  
• 

  Adan Justias nu numai ca isi doresc garantiile, dar le si au! aceste tari sunt in NATO deci au garantiile! daca cineva prin sua se gandeste ca la o adica garantiile pot fi trecute cu vederea atunci viitorul va fi sumbru pentru aceasta alianta si pentru anumite valori