Ovidiu Stoica
A
good deal of the drive behind the anti-white ideology, the
sanctification of minorities and other marginal, poorly integrated
groups, and the flooding with legal and
illegal immigrant foreigners of the formerly 'white-countries', comes
from this desire of the Western elites to secure Globalization.
To be secure, Globalization needs to destroy the European nation-states, to destroy the white-ethnic majorities around whom these states were once created. Otherwise there will always be the danger of these nations rebelling (for whatever reasons) and re-erecting hard borders (which will impede the free-flow of investments/capital and economic goods) since their will is (at least in theory) the only thing which gives legitimacy to the state (and to its use of force/violence).
That’s why immigration is pushed by the moneyed elites even when it doesn’t make immediate economic sense, they have in view the possible future problems and long term security.
To be secure, Globalization needs to destroy the European nation-states, to destroy the white-ethnic majorities around whom these states were once created. Otherwise there will always be the danger of these nations rebelling (for whatever reasons) and re-erecting hard borders (which will impede the free-flow of investments/capital and economic goods) since their will is (at least in theory) the only thing which gives legitimacy to the state (and to its use of force/violence).
That’s why immigration is pushed by the moneyed elites even when it doesn’t make immediate economic sense, they have in view the possible future problems and long term security.
Seen form a historical perspective, Globalization is the continuation
of the liberal project of modernity which started in the 18th century
but got immediately trapped inside the boundaries of the national state
because of the (almost simultaneous) emergence of nationalism. It had to
limit itself to promoting liberalism and individualism to the citizens
of a given nation-state.
But the goal of the liberal ideology was from the start to achieve universal individualism and contractual only relations between individuals, i.e. no non-commercial (not chosen) community bonds&loyalties which limit and impose obligations on the individual.
The French Revolution, the bloody and quintessentially liberal revolution, issued its official creed as "The Declaration of the Rights of Man" (in 1789) prompting Joseph de Maistre to write sarcastically “Now, there is no such thing as ‘man’ in this world. In my life I have seen Frenchmen, Italians, Russians, and so on... But as for man, I declare I’ve never encountered him.” and that "A constitution that is made for all nations is made for none."
These raise the question of how much of the Western madness and Western self-negation (adoration of the third-world non-white migrants) that we witness today is a mere rationalization of the economic interests of the (now post-national, global) elites and how much is the triumph of a moralistic anti-white ideology/religion pushed by militant minorities bent to twist the culture so as to fit their interests.
Perhaps it is a lethal cross-hybridization, a case of convergent interests.
But the goal of the liberal ideology was from the start to achieve universal individualism and contractual only relations between individuals, i.e. no non-commercial (not chosen) community bonds&loyalties which limit and impose obligations on the individual.
The French Revolution, the bloody and quintessentially liberal revolution, issued its official creed as "The Declaration of the Rights of Man" (in 1789) prompting Joseph de Maistre to write sarcastically “Now, there is no such thing as ‘man’ in this world. In my life I have seen Frenchmen, Italians, Russians, and so on... But as for man, I declare I’ve never encountered him.” and that "A constitution that is made for all nations is made for none."
These raise the question of how much of the Western madness and Western self-negation (adoration of the third-world non-white migrants) that we witness today is a mere rationalization of the economic interests of the (now post-national, global) elites and how much is the triumph of a moralistic anti-white ideology/religion pushed by militant minorities bent to twist the culture so as to fit their interests.
Perhaps it is a lethal cross-hybridization, a case of convergent interests.
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu