Vestul nu ar trebui sa se blameze pentru revansismul lui Putin-13 aprilie
cnn.com|De Robin Niblett,
Special to CNN
There is a growing belief among many in the West
that Europe and the United States provoked President Putin into annexing
Crimea. Moscow's reaction to NATO expansion and to the EU's efforts to bring
Ukraine into its orbit was, it is said,..
„(CNN) -- There is a growing belief among many in the West
that Europe and the United States provoked President Putin into annexing
Crimea. Moscow's reaction to NATO expansion and to the EU's efforts to bring
Ukraine into its orbit was, it is said, inevitable.
In this view, Western leaders backed Putin into a
corner and, with the situation worsening in eastern Ukraine, it is time we gave
him an exit plan.
Interestingly, this is the prevalent view in
Southeast Asia, a region not lacking a large and assertive neighbor of its own.
In Singapore last week, several prominent figures
told me Southeast Asia is managing better the challenge of a resurgent China
than Europe is a re-assertive Russia. But this is a misleading comparison.
China and Russia present entirely different propositions to their neighbors.
President Xi Jinping recognizes the logic of win-win
international politics.
Whilst tightening his political control, he has
overseen what is perhaps China's most ambitious strategy for market-led
socio-economic reform since the Deng Xiaoping era, and launched an all-out
assault on the rampant levels of corruption in the Chinese Communist Party.
Having failed with economic coercion, [Putin] is now
also resorting to political and military coercion to prevent Ukraine from
escaping Russia's economic stranglehold.
Robin Niblett
Robin Niblett
In focusing on growth and modernization, Xi is aware
of the importance of a stable and prosperous regional environment, and has
sought to manage the growing anxiety and resentment that China's rise is
causing among its Southeast Asian neighbors. Relations with Japan have deteriorated to a dangerous
level, but in China's southern neighborhood Xi has worked hard to improve
relations.
Ties with Vietnam and Malaysia have been bolstered,
despite competing territorial claims over islands in the South China Sea. China
is increasingly active in a range of regional multilateral institutions, and
has sustained a constructive political and economic relationship with the
United States, despite their competing strategic roles in the region.
Most importantly, China
is ever more deeply integrated economically with its neighbors across East
Asia, serving as an essential engine of regional economic growth. From a
Chinese perspective, the rising tide lifts all boats. Neighbors that are
economically strong support China's growth. Given its relative size, China's
political influence will only grow as a result.
'Law of jungle'
The contrast between this approach and that of
President Putin could not be starker. Putin appears to see the world through a
unique prism of winner takes all and loser loses everything. He represents a
19th century "law of
the jungle" mentality, in the words of Angela Merkel. This makes
Russia an altogether more dangerous neighbor.
As tends to be the case with bad
neighbors, Russia's belligerence stems from problems at home. Despite recent
high global oil prices, Putin presides over an economy
in reverse. Russia's current account surplus was already projected to have
disappeared this year, before the crisis over Ukraine. Capital outflows
amounted to $63 billion last year, a figure at least matched in the
first quarter of 2014. In the meantime, growth is projected to fall in 2014 to
0.6% according to Russian figures, after achieving only 1.3% in 2013.
Like Xi, Putin has tightened his control over the
media and political opposition. But rather than accompanying political
tightening with economic reform, his government has side-stepped market-opening
commitments made as part of Russia's WTO accession. And rather than tackling ever-deepening
corruption, he has continued to hand his close allies the choicest parts of
the Russian economy through Kremlin-led corporate mergers and lucrative
concessions.
Regionally, Putin's notion of national security is to
surround Russia with what Karel de Gucht, the EU Trade Commissioner, recently
described as a string of economic "black holes" (such as Ukraine and
Belarus) and "frozen conflicts" (including in Transnistria, Abkhazia
and South Ossetia).
These areas remain dependent upon Russia for their
economic survival and constitute a further hindrance to Russian economic
growth. Where China recognizes the necessity of a stable neighborhood, Putin
has manufactured a volatile and vulnerable one.
Nor does he show any interest in exiting this
spiral. Having failed with economic coercion, he is now also resorting to
political and military coercion to prevent Ukraine from escaping Russia's
economic stranglehold.
No return
Russia will not reform under Putin's watch, as some
in the West once hoped. He blames the West for Russia's ills and wallows in
victimhood. But he avoids reforming the economic system he created, and
perceives steps towards embedding the rule of law, accountable government and
more open markets around Russia's neighborhood as threats to his and Russia's
power.
If the choice now is between trying to bring
President Putin gradually in from the cold, or containing his worst instincts
towards Russia's European neighbors, the latter is the only rational answer.
Europe and the United States should not accept the
way Crimea was annexed into Russia, and should be prepared and willing to apply
major economic sanctions should Putin raise the stakes again over Ukraine or
Transnistria. Over time, Ukraine should be integrated into EU markets through
the completion of the Association Agreement along with substantial financial
support.
There can be no return for Putin to the G8 or
business-as-usual in NATO until Russian economic and military threats against
its European neighbors are lifted and a mutually acceptable solution is found
to Crimea's status.
Putin's actions are not a response to European and
American provocations. He has painted himself into a corner with a combination
of strategic paranoia, dreams of Russian revanche and economic illiteracy. As
it seeks to present a strong and united response, the West can ill afford to
blame itself.
Un Prospectiv
Balon de sapun
G.G Interesant ca CNN
preia de la CH semn ca propaganda rusa a reusit sa convinga si acum se doreste
echilibrarea/calibrarea raportului de forte in PR.Este inceputul.
Un.P Da, sunt(em) de acord. Problema e ca aflam in felul
asta ca deocamdata nu exista iesire negociata.
G.G Cred ca rusilor li
s-a urcat la cap putin si normal trebuie readusi cu picioarele pe pamant.
Un.P Se poate spune si asta, desi acum cred ca grija
Vestului e de a nu incuraja astfel de miscari pe baza acestui precedent. China
e entitatea vizata...
Gabriel Chircu
autorul ar fi gasit usor un job la academia fane
gheorghiu acum cateva zeci de ani; atat de biased, superficial si arogant,
n-are o iota de credibilitate. pe scurt - a waste of time/space
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu